Architecture for feedback loops in decision feedback equalizers

ABSTRACT

A decision feedback equalizer (DFE) has an inter symbol interference (ISI) loop and inter chip interference (ICI) loop. A buffer at the input of the DFE loop receives a (CCK based data rate) signal coming into the DFE, retains a predetermined number of chips from each incoming symbol and assists to meet timing requirements by chip management. An outgoing rate for the chips from the buffer may depend on the incoming rate and may be higher than the incoming rate by a known factor. A method of designing a configuration for the DFE takes into consideration the timing delay in the loops. The operation within the DFE loop is pipelined, and any latency due to the pipelining is handled at a CCK demodulator. A method for designing the DFE architecture and an article comprising a storage medium with instructions thereon for executing the method, are also disclosed.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

Benefit is claimed under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to U.S. ProvisionalApplication Ser. No. 60/570,712, entitled “An efficient architecture forfeedback loops in Spread Spectrum Systems”, by Rahul Garg et al., filedMay 13, 2004, which is herein incorporated in its entirety by referencefor all purposes.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention generally relates to a feedback based scheme in wirelesslocal area networks, and more particularly to architecture for feedbackloops in a decision feedback equalizer (DFE) for spread spectrumsystems.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

DFE is a feedback based scheme for channel equalization in signalhandling. For signal processing, the text of the high speed extension ofthe IEEE standard 802.11b specifies complementary code keying (CCK) asthe modulation scheme for 5.5 and 11 Mbps data rates in the 2.4 GHzband. In the CCK modulation scheme, CCK code words are transmitted whichcorrespond to the actual bits to be sent. The IEEE 802.11b CCK codes arepolyphase complementary codes (or binary complementary sequences ornumber of pairs of like elements) with any given separation in oneseries being equal to the numbers of pairs of unlike elements with thesame separation in the other series. For background information on CCK,reference may be had to the article entitled “CCK Modulation delivers 11Mbps for High Rate IEEE 802.11 Extension” in “WirelessSymposium/Portable by Design Conference, Spring-1999”. The 802.11bcomplementary codes in one form have a code length of 8 and a chippingrate of 11 M chips/s. The 8 complex chips comprise a single symbol. EachCCK code word consists of eight chips. In 5.5 Mbps case, incoming bitsare divided into blocks of four bits. The MSB two bits are used toselect one of the four code words and LSB two bits to perform DQPSKmodulation on all the eight chips of the selected code word. Similarly,in 11 Mbps case, incoming bits are divided into blocks of eight bits,MSB six bits are used to select one of the 64 code words and LSB twobits to perform DQPSK modulation. So, each code word is called a‘symbol’ and the eight values in each code word are called ‘chips’.

A transmitted signal can thus be represented as,

-   s1=[c1, c2, c3, c4, c5, c6, c7, c8]-   s2=[c1, c2, c3, c4, c5, c6, c7, c8]-   . . .-   . . .-   sn=[c1, c2, c3, c4, c5, c6, c7, c8],-   where s1, s2 . . . sn are the symbols and-   c1, c2 . . . c8 are the chips

The symbols s1, s2 . . . sn, are transmitted sequentially.

Now, in the receiver, the symbol decision, which is deciding all theeight chips of the symbol, is performed using CCK demodulation. Thisinvolves correlation with each of four code words in the 5.5. Mbps caseand each of 64 code words in the 11 Mbps case followed by maximumpicking. This will be used to remove inter symbol interference. But, toremove the interference caused due to the chips within a symbol, chipdecision is used. Symbol decision consists in deciding s1, s2 . . . snand chip decision consists in deciding c1, c2 . . . c8 for each symbol.

The codeword is used to modulate the carrier. A base band processorimplements the CCK waveform to achieve high data rates over wirelesslinks. The base band processor can generally improve packet error rateperformance in multi-path environments through the use of RAKE receiverarchitecture and Decision Feedback Equalizer. U.S. Pat. No. 6,233,273 toWebster et al on May 15, 2001, teaches regarding RAKE receivers in thecontext of WLAN applications. However, the question of chip managementfor interference removal and reducing error propagation in DFE designsneeds to be addressed to obtain efficient alternatives for DFE designarchitecture.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

One embodiment of the invention resides in a method of designing asystem configuration for a decision feedback equalizer (DFE) forhandling an incoming signal, comprising the steps of: providing an intersymbol interference (ISI) loop for addressing removal of ISI caused onsymbols, using symbol decisions; providing an inter chip interference(ICI) loop for addressing removal of ICI caused on chips, using chipdecisions; and, using chip management based on timing delay in afeedback loop for ISI removal and ICI removal, for selecting a systemconfiguration for said DFE.

A second embodiment of the invention teaches decision feedback equalizer(DFE) for use in signal handling where CCK is used and is associatedwith CCK symbols, the DFE comprising: an inter symbol interference (ISI)loop for addressing removal of ISI caused on symbols using symboldecisions; an inter chip interference (ICI) loop for addressing removalof ICI caused on chips, using chip decisions, said DFE being configuredto use chip management for controlling ISI removal and ICI removal. Alsotaught herein is an article comprising a storage medium havinginstructions thereon which when executed by a computing platform resultin a method as stated above.

The present invention teaches various system configurations for the DFEthat can implement different feedback arrangements, taking intoconsideration the system timing requirements. The feedback based schemeprovides an efficient DFE without having to use redundant hardware. Theincoming signal to the DFE may be packet based and may be passed througha buffer that assists in meeting the timing requirements of the DFE.Even though the invention has specific application to IEEE 802.11breceivers for CCK based rates, the invention is envisaged to beapplicable, without limitation in any scenario involving a feedbackbased DFE for channel equalization.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING

FIG. 1 illustrates a DFE configuration using an ISI removal loop and anICI removal loop;

FIG. 2 illustrates one embodiment of the DFE;

FIG. 3 illustrates a second embodiment of the DFE showing a modifiedconfiguration; and,

FIG. 4 illustrates a general purpose computing platform that can be usedin implementing the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following detailed description of the various embodiments of theinvention, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form apart hereof, and in which are shown by way of illustration specificembodiments in which the invention may be practiced. These embodimentsare described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art topractice the invention, and it is to be understood that otherembodiments may be utilized and that changes may be made withoutdeparting from the scope of the present invention. The followingdetailed description is not to be taken in a limiting sense, and thescope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims andtheir equivalents.

A decision feedback equalizer (DFE) is a feedback-based scheme forchannel equalization. As shown, the DFE includes two functions namely,ISI removal and ICI removal. FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of the DFEimplemented in an 802.11b receiver for the CCK based rates. The inputcomes from a feed forward filter (not shown in figure) and the output ofthe CCK Demodulator is sent to a differential phase shift keying (DPSK)demodulator. The same output is sent to the feedback loop for ISIremoval. Described herein are alternate configurations for the DFEdesign, using the present invention.

More particularly, FIG. 1 illustrates a high level view of the DFEarchitecture. The path C-D-E-F-G-C constitutes the ISI-removal and thepath D-H-I-D constitutes the ICI-removal. The input “Buffer” is providedto control the in-flow of CCK chips. The input comes from theFeed-forward (FF) filter after down sampling. The block diagram does notgive details of timing.

ISI-Removal:

This part of the DFE removes the effect of Inter Symbol Interference. Anexemplary algorithm is briefly described as follows:

-   1. The CCK demodulator decides which CCK code word was transmitted    and outputs the bits corresponding to that (E).-   2. The bits are modulated to obtain the ideal CCK code word (F).-   3. The code word (F) is passed through a feedback filter (G). The    coefficients of these are estimated from the post-cursor components    of the channel impulse response (CIR).

The interference component (G) so obtained is subtracted from the chipsof the next symbol at B. This cancels the ISI.

ICI-Removal:

The channel also introduces Inter Chip Interference. An exemplaryalgorithm to cancel this effect is as follows:

-   1. Chip-decision is made on the present chip (H).-   2. A similar feedback filter filters the decision (I).-   3. The output of the decision (I) is subtracted from the next chip    C.    Timing

The timing of the data flow is discussed in the following.

ISI Loop:

The total loop time (forward path delay+reverse path delay) should notexceed one CCK symbol. CCK symbol rate is 1.375 MHz. CCK correlation isa computation intensive operation. Pipelining is used for low areaimplementation. This leads to pipeline latency. CCK code words arrive at11 MHz rate. All 8 chips of the code word are needed for symboldecision. This property is used to account for the latency. The firstfew input chips are buffered. In the meantime, the symbol decision ofthe previous symbol is done and is available for ISI cleaning of thepresent symbol. Then, the cleaned chips are sent to the CCK demodulator.This is done at a faster rate so that chips do not keep queuing up atthe buffer.

ICI Loop:

ICI removal contributes to the loop time of ISI, as it is present on theforward path. This is a three-step process. The total time taken forthis should not exceed the chip period ( 1/11 microseconds) ideally.However, due to the buffering done for ISI, the actual chip rate will behigher and therefore, the constraint is tighter.

For ICI cleaning, the input chips C and the cleaning value (I) mustarrive at the same time. For ISI cleaning, the input chips (B) and thecleaning value (G) must arrive at the same time. The CCK Demodulatortakes its inputs from D. The first three chips from the feed forwardfilter are stored in the buffer. When the fourth chip is entering thebuffer, the first chip is shifted out. It is cleaned and sent to CCKdemodulator. In the meantime, the second is sent out and so on. So, thebuffer contents will look as seen below, in time.

Buffer contents are shown below: TABLE 1 Buffer Contents Time (Clk44Cycles) Buffer 0 C0 1 C0 2 C0 3 C0 4 C0, C1 5 C0, C1 6 C0, C1 7 C0, C1 8C0, C1, C2 9 C0, C1, C2 10 C0, C1, C2 11 C0, C1, C2 12 C0, C1, C2, C3 13C0, C1, C2, C3 14 C1, C2, C3, → C0 leaves the buffer 15 C1, C2, C3 16C2, C3, C4 → C1 leaves the buffer 17 C2, C3, C4 18 C3, C4 → C2 leavesthe buffer 19 C3, C4 20 C4, C5 → C3 leaves the buffer 21 C4, C5 22 C5 →C4 leaves the buffer 23 C5 24 C6 → C5 leaves the buffer 25 C6 26 — → C6leaves the buffer 27 — 28 — → C7 by passes buffer 29 — 30 — 31 — 32 C833 C8

With the above exemplary case, 13 cycles are available for CCKDemodulation.

Exemplary Buffer details:

-   -   Length of the buffer is 4.    -   Input is coming at 11 MHz. (Down sampled values of feed-forward        filter)    -   Once the buffer is full with first 4 values of a symbol, data        starts leaving the buffer at 22 MHz, so that by the time 8^(th)        chip is filtered out from the feed forward filter, it is ready        to enter the DFE loops.

Buffer is cleared towards the end of the symbol.

FIG. 2 illustrates a DFE architecture including the ISI removal loop andthe ICI removal loop similar to the illustration in FIG. 1; however, itis seen from the illustration in FIG. 2 that after the feedback filterin the ISI loop, part of the ISI removal is done at the CCK demodulatorwhich cooperates with a peak detector. In the context of FIG. 2, if theCCK demodulator delay is higher, the ISI cleaning due to the first 2chips is performed in the correlator stages of the demodulator.

FIG. 3 illustrates a further modified DFE architecture which adds afeedback link to the FIG. 2 arrangement. The added link is by way ofobtaining a tap from the ISI feedback loop and connecting the tap to theICI loop, so as to obtain a system configuration that provides a hybridstructure for cleansing ISI and ICI based on symbol and chip decisions.The added link includes a box labeled “ICI Initialization”.

The following is noted in the context of FIGS. 2 and 3: The first 2chips will be cleaned by the buffer memory of the ICI itself.Expediently, the cleaned first 2 chips will be fed to the FWT along withthe other chips, which have the exact cleaning from the FB pathinitialized. (ICI scheme also does partial ISI cleaning), (EmbeddedPartial ISI-ICI in ISI)

The first 2 chips will be passed directly through the FWT but theremaining chips would have to be cleaned in the regular loop.

The foregoing is a description of system configurations for the DFE thatcan implement different feedback arrangements, taking into considerationthe system timing requirements. The feedback based scheme provides anefficient DFE without having to use redundant hardware. As described,the DFE cooperates with a buffer that assists in meeting the timingrequirements of the DFE as explained in detail above. As explainedearlier in the context of the ISI loop, pipelining is used in theinvention for low area implementation. However, latency or delay due topipelining is handled at the CCK demodulator input as it always waitsfor all the eight chips of the symbol to arrive. Even though theinvention has specific application to IEEE 802.11b receivers for CCKbased rates, the invention is envisaged to be applicable, withoutlimitation in any scenario involving feedback based DFE for channelequalization.

Computations required for implementing the design method for the DFEdescribed herein may be done using a general purpose computing platformor any other suitable computing arrangement.

Various embodiments of the present subject matter can be implemented insoftware, which may be run in the environment shown in FIG. 4 or in anyother suitable computing environment. The embodiments of the presentsubject matter are operable in a number of general-purpose orspecial-purpose computing environments. Some computing environmentsinclude personal computers, general-purpose computers, server computers,hand-held devices (including, but not limited to, telephones andpersonal digital assistants (PDAs of all types)), laptop devices,multi-processors, microprocessors, set-top boxes, programmable consumerelectronics, network computers, minicomputers, mainframe computers,distributed computing environments and the like to execute code storedon a computer-readable medium. It is also noted that the embodiments ofthe present subject matter may be implemented in part or in whole asmachine-executable instructions, such as program modules that areexecuted by a computer. Generally, program modules include routines,programs, objects, components, data structures, and the like to performparticular tasks or to implement particular abstract data types. In adistributed computing environment, program modules may be located inlocal or remote storage devices.

FIG. 4 shows an example of a suitable computing system environment forimplementing embodiments of the present subject matter. FIG. 4 and thefollowing discussion are intended to provide a brief, generaldescription of a suitable computing environment in which certainembodiments of the inventive concepts contained herein may beimplemented.

A general computing device in the form of a computer 410 may include aprocessing unit 402, memory 404, removable storage 412, andnon-removable storage 414. Computer 410 additionally includes a bus 405and a network interface (NI) 401. Computer 410 may include or haveaccess to a computing environment that includes one or more user inputdevices 416, one or more output modules or devices 418, and one or morecommunication connections 420 such as a network interface card or a USBconnection. The one or more user input devices 416 can be a touch screenand a stylus and the like. The one or more output devices 418 can be adisplay device of computer, computer monitor, TV screen, plasma display,LCD display, display on a touch screen, display on an electronic tablet,and the like. The computer 410 may operate in a networked environmentusing the communication connection 420 to connect to one or more remotecomputers. A remote computer may include a personal computer, server,router, network PC, a peer device or other network node, and/or thelike. The communication connection may include a Local Area Network(LAN), a Wide Area Network (WAN), and/or other networks.

The memory 404 may include volatile memory 406 and non-volatile memory408. A variety of computer-readable media may be stored in and accessedfrom the memory elements of computer 410, such as volatile memory 406and non-volatile memory 408, removable storage 412 and non-removablestorage 414. Computer memory elements can include any suitable memorydevice(s) for storing data and machine-readable instructions, such asread only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), erasableprogrammable read only memory (EPROM), electrically erasableprogrammable read only memory (EEPROM), hard drive, removable mediadrive for handling compact disks (CDs), digital video disks (DVDs),diskettes, magnetic tape cartridges, memory cards, Memory Sticks™, andthe like, chemical storage, biological storage, and other types of datastorage.

“Processor” or “processing unit,” as used herein, means any type ofcomputational circuit, such as, but not limited to, a microprocessor, amicrocontroller, a complex instruction set computing (CISC)microprocessor, a reduced instruction set computing (RISC)microprocessor, a very long instruction word (VLIW) microprocessor,explicitly parallel instruction computing (EPIC) microprocessor, agraphics processor, a digital signal processor, or any other type ofprocessor or processing circuit. The term also includes embeddedcontrollers, such as generic or programmable logic devices or arrays,application specific integrated circuits, single-chip computers, smartcards, and the like.

Embodiments of the present subject matter may be implemented inconjunction with program modules, including functions, procedures, datastructures, application programs, etc., for performing tasks, ordefining abstract data types or low-level hardware contexts.

Machine-readable instructions stored on any of the above-mentionedstorage media are executable by the processing unit 402 of the computer410. For example, a computer program 425 may include machine-readableinstructions capable of handling a packet based input signal, to performcomputations in using the ISI loop and an inside ICI loop, and providedifferent DFE architectures for feedback loops in spread spectrumsystems. In one embodiment, the computer program 425 may be included ona CD-ROM and loaded from the CD-ROM to a hard drive in non-volatilememory 408. The machine-readable instructions cause the computer 410 todecode according to the various embodiments of the present subjectmatter.

The foregoing is the description of exemplary implementations of themethod and DFE apparatus for an improved feedback based loop DFE design,satisfying the design-timing requirements. The embodiments describedabove use a buffer and control of a timing delay in the ISI and ICIloops to accomplish the objective of providing an efficient DFEarchitecture. The above-described implementation is intended to beapplicable, without limitation, to situations where DFE designarchitecture needs to be addressed, as for example in 802.11b receiverswith CCK based rates. The description hereinabove is intended to beillustrative, and not restrictive.

The design approach for DFE architecture described herein is applicablegenerally to any communication system requiring a DFE with an improvedfeedback loop based design, and the embodiments described herein are inno way intended to limit the applicability of the invention. Inaddition, the techniques of the various exemplary embodiments are usefulto the design of any hardware implementations of software, firmware, andalgorithms in the context of decoding in general. Many other embodimentswill be apparent to those skilled in the art. The scope of thisinvention should therefore be determined by the appended claims assupported by the text, along with the full scope of equivalents to whichsuch claims are entitled.

1. A method of designing a system configuration for a decision feedbackequalizer (DFE) for handling an incoming signal, comprising the stepsof: providing an inter symbol interference (ISI) loop for addressingremoval of ISI caused on symbols, using symbol decisions; providing aninter chip interference (ICI) loop for addressing removal of ICI causedon chips, using chip decisions; and, using chip management based ontiming delay in a feedback loop for ISI removal and ICI removal, forselecting a system configuration for said DFE.
 2. The method as in claim1, wherein complementary code keying (CCK) is used and is associatedwith CCK symbols, the method including the step of using a buffer forreceiving said incoming signal, and using buffer and chip management forselecting a system configuration for said DFE.
 3. The method as in claim2, wherein said incoming signal has code-words/symbols each havingchips, wherein, said step of using chip management allows for symboldecision based cleaning for ISI removal, followed by chip decision basedcleaning for ICI removal.
 4. The method as in claim 2, wherein saidincoming signal has code-words/symbols each having chips, wherein, thestep of using chip management comprises a hybrid use of ISI removal andICI removal.
 5. The method as in claim 4, wherein complementary codekeying (CCK) is used and is associated with CCK symbols, including thestep of using a CCK demodulator, wherein the step of using chipmanagement for ISI removal allows for a predetermined number of chips tobe moved away from said ISI loop.
 6. The method as in claim 5, includingthe step of moving said predetermined number of chips to a first stageof a Fast Walsh Transform that is included in said CCK demodulator. 7.The method as in claim 6, where the predetermined number of chips istwo.
 8. The method as in claim 1, wherein the incoming signal is apacket based signal, including the step of using a buffer forcontrolling inflow of chips in said incoming signal, said bufferproviding buffer management in addition to said chip management toassist in selecting a system configuration for the DFE.
 9. The method asin claim 8, including the step of limiting a number of chips that can bestored in the buffer at any given time.
 10. The method as in claim 9,the method including the step of releasing stored chips from the bufferwhen new chips come into the buffer.
 11. The method as in claim 10,wherein an outgoing rate for chips from said buffer is dependent on anincoming rate for chips into the buffer, but is higher than the incomingrate by a predetermined factor.
 12. The method as in claim 11, whereinthe number of chips that can be stored in the buffer is 4, and whereinsaid predetermined factor is
 2. 13. The method as in claim 1, whereinsaid incoming signal has code-words/symbols each having chips, whereinthe step of providing an ISI loop further comprises: using a CCKdemodulator to decide which CCK codeword was transmitted from saidincoming signal, and producing bits corresponding to said transmittedCCK codeword; modulating the produced bits to obtain an ideal CCKcodeword; passing said ideal CCK codeword through a feedback filter toobtain an interference component; and, subtracting said interferencecomponent from chips of a next symbol in said incoming signal.
 14. Themethod as in claim 8, wherein said incoming signal coming through saidbuffer has code-words/symbols each having chips, wherein the step ofproviding an ISI loop further comprises: using a CCK demodulator todecide which CCK codeword was transmitted from said buffer, andproducing bits corresponding to said transmitted CCK codeword;modulating the produced bits to obtain an ideal CCK codeword; passingsaid ideal CCK codeword through a feedback filter to obtain aninterference component; and, subtracting said interference componentfrom chips of a next symbol coming through said buffer.
 15. The methodas in claim 1, wherein said step of providing an ICI loop comprises:sampling said incoming signal at a start of said ICI loop and making achip decision on a present chip; passing said chip decision through asecond feedback filter to obtain an ICI interference component; and,subtracting said ICI interference component from a next chip to effectICI removal.
 16. The method as in claim 8, wherein said incoming signalcoming through said buffer has code-words/symbols each having chips,wherein said step of providing an ICI loop comprises: sampling saidincoming signal coming out of said buffer at a start of said ICI loopand making a chip decision on a present chip; passing said chip decisionthrough a second feedback filter to obtain an ICI interferencecomponent; and, subtracting said ICI interference component from a nextchip to effect ICI removal.
 17. The method as in claim 4, including thestep of using a feedback from said ISI loop into said ICI loop toselectively cause ICI removal initialization.
 18. A decision feedbackequalizer (DFE) for use in signal handling where CCK is used and isassociated with CCK symbols, said DFE comprising: inter symbolinterference (ISI) loop for addressing removal of ISI caused on symbolsusing symbol decisions; an inter chip interference (ICI) loop foraddressing removal of ICI caused on chips, using chip decisions; saidDFE being configured to use chip management for controlling ISI removaland ICI removal.
 19. The DFE as in claim 18, wherein complementary codekeying (CCK) is used and is associated with CCK symbols, the DFEincluding a buffer for receiving and timing said incoming signal, saidbuffer providing buffer management in addition to chip management forselecting a system configuration for said DFE.
 20. The DFE as in claim19, wherein said incoming signal has code-words/symbols each havingchips, wherein, said chip management allows for symbol decision basedcleaning for ISI removal, followed by chip decision based cleaning forICI removal.
 21. The DFE as in claim 19, wherein said incoming signalhas code-words/symbols each having chips, wherein, said chip managementcomprises a hybrid use of ISI removal and ICI removal.
 22. The DFE as inclaim 21, wherein complementary code keying (CCK) is used and isassociated with CCK symbols, including a CCK demodulator, wherein chipmanagement for ISI removal allows for a predetermined number of chips tobe moved away from said ISI loop.
 23. The DFE as in claim 22, whereinsaid predetermined number of chips are moved from said ISI loop to afirst stage of a Fast Walsh Transform that is included in said CCKdemodulator.
 24. The DFE as in claim 18, wherein said incoming signalhas code-words/symbols each having chips, wherein said ISI loop furthercomprises: a CCK demodulator for deciding which CCK codeword wastransmitted from said incoming signal, and producing bits correspondingto said transmitted CCK codeword; a modulator for modulating theproduced bits to obtain an ideal CCK codeword; a feedback filter forreceiving said ideal CCK codeword to obtain an interference component;and, means for subtracting said interference component from chips of anext symbol in said incoming signal.
 25. The DFE as in claim 19, whereinsaid incoming signal coming through said buffer has code-words/symbolseach having chips, wherein the step of providing an ISI loop furthercomprises: a CCK demodulator to decide which CCK codeword wastransmitted from said buffer, and producing bits corresponding to saidtransmitted CCK codeword; a modulator for modulating the produced bitsto obtain an ideal CCK codeword; a feedback filter for receiving saidideal CCK codeword to obtain an interference component; and, means forsubtracting said interference component from chips of a next symbolcoming through said buffer.
 26. The DFE as in claim 18, wherein said ICIloop comprises: means for sampling said incoming signal at a start ofsaid ICI loop and making a chip decision on a present chip; a secondfeedback filter for handling said chip decision to obtain an ICIinterference component; and, means for subtracting said ICI interferencecomponent from a next chip to effect ICI removal.
 27. The DFE as inclaim 19, wherein said incoming signal coming through said buffer hascode-words/symbols each having chips, wherein said ICI loop comprises:means for sampling said incoming signal coming out of said buffer at astart of said ICI loop and making a chip decision on a present chip; asecond feedback filter for handling said chip decision to obtain an ICIinterference component; and, means for subtracting said ICI interferencecomponent from a next chip to effect ICI removal.
 28. An articlecomprising a storage medium having instructions thereon which whenexecuted by a computing platform result in execution of a method fordesigning a system configuration for a decision feedback equalizer (DFE)for handling an incoming signal, comprising the steps of: providing aninter symbol interference (ISI) loop for addressing removal of ISIcaused on symbols, using symbol decisions; providing an inter chipinterference (ICI) loop for addressing removal of ICI caused on chips,using chip decisions; and, using chip management based on timing delayin a feedback loop for ISI removal and ICI removal, for selecting asystem configuration for said DFE.
 29. The article as in claim 28,wherein complementary code keying (CCK) is used and is associated withCCK symbols, wherein said method includes the step of using a buffer forreceiving said incoming signal, and using buffer and chip management forselecting a system configuration for said DFE.
 30. The article as inclaim 29, wherein said incoming signal coming through said buffer hascode-words/symbols each having chips, wherein the step of providing anISI loop further comprises: using a CCK demodulator to decide which CCKcodeword was transmitted from said buffer, and producing bitscorresponding to said transmitted CCK codeword; modulating the producedbits to obtain an ideal CCK codeword; passing said ideal CCK codewordthrough a feedback filter to obtain an interference component; and,subtracting said interference component from chips of a next symbolcoming through said buffer.
 31. The article as in claim 29, wherein saidincoming signal coming through said buffer has code-words/symbols eachhaving chips, wherein said step of providing an ICI loop comprises:sampling said incoming signal coming out of said buffer at a start ofsaid ICI loop and making a chip decision on a present chip; passing saidchip decision through a second feedback filter to obtain an ICIinterference component; and, subtracting said ICI interference componentfrom a next chip to effect ICI removal.
 32. The article as in claim 29,wherein the method includes the step of limiting a number of chips thatcan be stored in the buffer at any given time.